Alpert, Goldberg v. Quinn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where the pleadings placed at issue the work product and competency of a law firm, an AOM was required
• reversing a Rule 1:4-8 sanction in part because the court failed \to set forth findings pursuant to Rule 1:7-4\
• declining to hear a discovery issue not presented to the trial court
• \A contract is unenforceable where contrary to public policy.\ (Citing Manning Eng'g, Inc. v. Hudson Cnty. Park Comm'n, 74 N.J. 113, 138 (1977))
• absent production of \an expert to opine on the reasonableness of the services rendered\, the trial court \appropriately found that there was no genuine material A-5409-18 44 fact at issue\
• \[A] new issue cannot be raised in a reply brief.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).