Alofs Manufacturing Co. v. Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. (In Re Alofs Manufacturing Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that delivery had not occurred when goods were sent from the seller to the buyer “for testing purposes” and where the parties agreed the goods would be returned to seller “regardless of the outcome of the tests”
• stating that the burden of proof is on the movant and concluding, after a lengthy analysis of pre-Code law, that a “preponderance of the evidence” standard applies rather than a “clear and convincing” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).