Almus WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ALICEVILLE, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the term is indeed a part of everyday parlance . . . , we wonder how its use can be so prejudicial as to warrant its exclusion.”
• direct evidence of discrimination cannot be met by McDonnell Douglas rebuttal
• more difficult for plaintiff with no direct evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).