Almonte v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no genuine issue of fact regarding the formation of an agreement existed where the party opposing its enforcement merely stated that he did not remember signing the documents and did not believe he had signed them
• where defendant did not deny signing document but merely gave “equivocal testimony” that “the signature did not look like 10 his and he could not remember signing it”
• appellant’s equivocal testimony, in which he did not deny signing bill of sale but testified that the signature on it did not look like his, was insufficient to create issue of fact as to authenticity of his signature
• appellant’s equivocal testimony, in which he did not deny signing bill of sale but testified that the signature on it did not look like his, was insufficient to create issue of fact as to authenticity of his signature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).