Almond v. Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because appellant applied for extension of time to file transcript after the initial filing period expired, trial court's grant of the motion was \nugatory and void\
• concluding that because appellant applied for extension of time to file transcript after the initial filing period expired, trial court’s grant of the motion was “nugatory and void”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• ACCC Insurance Co. v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-10· cited 10×
• Gordon v. Dennis
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-07-20· cited 3×
• Hadavi v. Palmer
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-03-24· cited 3×
• Chanda M. Gordon v. Tracy E. Dennis
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-07-20

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Baxter v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1970-09-25· cited 14×