Almirall, LLC v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning that review of whether plaintiff has standing \does not require that the factfinder ultimately find a plaintiff's allegations meritorious\
• holding where the plaintiffs’ fears about increased traffic and reduced parking were neither speculative nor remote, plaintiffs have standing
• standing found where defendant's hotel project would likely increase traffic and eliminate some public parking, upon which plaintiffs relied for \business and personal needs\
• distinguishing between plaintiffs' \success on the merits\ and status as \person aggrieved\ under G. L. c. 40A, § 17, for purposes of challenging zoning decision
• contrasting \tangible loss of parking spaces\ with \uncorroborated speculations\ about possibility that headlights would shine into window
• distinguishing review of \all the evidence\ for purposes of standing from review of claims on the merits [citation omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).