Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/13/1919
Almand v. State
Citations
- 149 Ga. 182
- 99 S.E. 795
- 1919 Ga. LEXIS 188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court did not err in instructing the jury to determine whether or not State’s witness was an accomplice, even where “[the witness] was a confessed accomplice and was jointly indicted” in the crime (punctuation omitted)
- court did not err in instructing the jury to determine whether or not State’s witness was an accomplice, even where “[the witness] was a confessed accomplice and was jointly indicted” in the crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fish
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-03-18· cited 32×
- Geter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1963-06-18· cited 24×
- Milton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-09-23· cited 23×
- Griffin v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1956-02-15· cited 10×
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-05-03· cited 8×
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1924-11-13· cited 6×
- Wooster v. BolesCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1974-01-07· cited 5×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-03-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.