Allvoice Computing PLC v. Nuance Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the specification contained sufficient structure be- cause the plaintiff’s expert provided “the only assessment” on record of the specification’s adequacy and the record contained no contradictory evidence
• adopting one party’s POSA definition where the other party “did not pose a different definition nor dispute the above definition”
• approving algorithm as sufficient where there were “several straightforward ways that [it] could be implemented by one skilled in the art using well-known features of the Windows operating system”
• “The test for definiteness asks whether one skilled in the art would understand the bounds of the claim when read in light of the specification.” (citation omitted)
• “The test for definiteness asks whether one skilled in the art would understand the bounds of the claim when read in light of the specification.”
• the patent's figures and accompanying description were \sufficient algorithmic structure\ for means-plus-function claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).