Alltel Corp. v. Actel Integrated Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ACTEL and ALLTEL were dissimilar as a whole based on the clearly different meanings invoked by the terms
• holding that an expert report was of “little evidentiary value” because “[t]he sample was too small” and “the margin of error” of “plus or minus 14%” was “too large”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).