Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Sharine Carrier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it is unnecessary to conduct a realistic probability inquiry” when “the elements of [the state] conviction … [do] not match the elements of the generic 23 federal offense”
• declining to apply a realistic probability analysis when the elements of the offense “leave nothing to the legal imagination” (internal quotation omitted)
• raising issue in BIA brief, even if omitted from Notice of Appeal is “sufficient to notify the BIA” of the dispute
• “[A] petitioner who completely omits an issue fails to meet the exhaustion requirement . . . .”
• “[A] petitioner who completely omits an issue [in his BIA appeal] fails to meet the exhaustion requirement with respect to that issue” (internal citation omitted)
• Pennsylvania statute requiring only conduct that “that could threaten the child’s physical or psychological welfare” was not a categorical “crime of child abuse” under INA (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).