Skip to main content
· 10/12/1989

Allstate Products Co. v. Colorado Department of Labor & Employment

Citations

  • 782 P.2d 880
  • 13 Brief Times Rptr. 1246
  • 1989 Colo. App. LEXIS 295
  • 1989 WL 120528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when considering a vagueness challenge, a reviewing “court must read and consider a challenged statute as a whole” (citing Bauer v. Sw. Denver Mental Health Ctr., Inc. , 701 P.2d 114 (Colo. App. 1985))
  • when considering a vagueness challenge, a reviewing “court must read and consider a challenged statute as a whole” (citing Bauer v. Sw. Denver Mental Health Ctr., Inc. , 701 P.2d 114 (Colo. App. 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Plank, Hume

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.