Allstate Insurance v. Sapp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that insurance company not estopped from denying coverage based upon statements by insured about existence of coverage in criminal case
• holding that insured’s failure to show justifiable reliance or a detrimental change in position precluded his claim that automobile insurer was estopped from denying coverage
• holding that insured's failure to show justifiable reliance or a detrimental change in position precluded his claim that automobile insurer was estopped from denying coverage
• deciding that insurance company not estopped from denying coverage based upon statements by insured about existence of coverage in criminal case
• holding that “[e]stoppel requires justifiable reliance on the opposing party’s representations or conduct and a change in position to one’s detriment” (citation omitted)
• whether one is an “insured” within the meaning of a policy is a legal question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).