Skip to main content
· 3/10/2011

Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles Herron

Citations

  • 634 F.3d 1101
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4645
  • 2011 WL 814999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing that these are 6 the “four basic grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be granted”
  • agreeing that these are 4 the “four basic grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be granted”
  • agreeing that these are the “four basic grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may 28 be granted”
  • agreeing that these are the “four basic grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion 24 may be granted”
  • recognizing manifest error of law or fact, newly discovered 26 evidence or previously unavailable evidence, manifest injustice, and intervening change in 27 controlling law as cognizable grounds for Rule 59(e) reconsideration
  • recognizing manifest error of law or fact, newly discovered evidence or 27 previously unavailable evidence, manifest injustice, and intervening change in controlling law as 28 cognizable grounds for Rule 59(e) reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, O'Scannlain, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.