Allstate Insurance Co. v. Sparks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an intended damages exclusion was in pari materia with language in the policy defining an “occurrence” under the policy as an “accident.”
• policy covered when son of insured intended to steal gasoline from truck but did not intend to start fire that destroyed mill
• policy covered when son of insured intended to steal gasoline from truck but did not intend to start fire that destroyed null
• destruction of a mill when the insured ignited gas fumes while attempting to steal gas
• intended means specific intent to cause precise injury which occurs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).