Allstate Ins. Co. v. Regar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether the plaintiff was one of the entities entitled to fees under section 627.428 was a question of statutory interpretation and thus an issue of law
• reaffirming the Quanstrom holding that a “multiplier could be appropriate under section 627.428 when there is a risk of nonpayment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).