Allstate Ins. Co. v. Arvida Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that “the order . . . requires Allstate to perform on the contract and, thus, the judgment could be construed as a . . . mandatory injunction, appealable under Rule 9.130(a)(3)(B)”
• to be distinguished from cases where the issue is coverage rather than duty to defend, e.g., Travelers Insurance Co. v. Bruns, 443 So.2d 959 (Fla. 1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).