Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. Your Store Online, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a corporate officer was the moving force behind an infringing activity when the officer participated and encouraged the sale of infringing products to the forum state
• holding that federal districts are “equally capable of applying federal law”
• implying that nineteen percent of a company’s total sales was “modest” under the Sutter Home analysis
• finding that lawsuit would not have occurred “but for” defendant’s interactive website and direct sales to California customers
• holding “plaintiffs may rely 14 on the allegations in their complaint to establish venue to the extent those allegations are 15 not controverted by defendant’s evidence.”
• finding this factor favored a “finding of reasonableness” where 23 defendants’ sold a “substantial amount of allegedly infringing products to [forum] customers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).