Allison v. Manetta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that truck being used as warning signal to alert drivers of accident was not being operated within meaning of § 52-556
• noting that foreseeability is considered in context of duty and causation analyses
• expert testimony not required for matter within ordinary knowledge and experience of fact finder
• “although §§ 14-251 and 14-290 exempt certain operators of equipment from prosecution for a violation of § 14-251, such exemption does not demonstrate that [the state employee’s] actions in parking the truck on the highway were not negligent [under § 52-556]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).