District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/26/1992
Allison v. Allison
Citations
- 605 So. 2d 130
- 1992 WL 203935
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for clarification where it was unclear how the trial court calculated deduction in temporary alimony arrear-age
- remanding for clarification where it was unclear how the trial court calculated deduction in temporary alimony arrearage
- case reversed for clarification of the arrearages amount when it was unclear how the trial court calculated the deduction
- case reversed for clarification of the arrearages amount when it was unclear how the trial court calculated the deduction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gunther
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dent v. DentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 12×
- Demorizi v. DemoriziDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 6×
- Flores v. FloresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-19· cited 3×
- Tibor E. Polcz v. Irma Eniko PolczDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-18· cited 2×
- Wright v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-19· cited 2×
- SAGIA D. CASTANEDA v. CARLOS CASTANEDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-07
- Castaneda v. CastanedaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-07
- Cone v. ConeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-21
- Joshua S. Winegar v. Gabrielle D. WinegarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-04-29
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.