Skip to main content
· 4/25/2022

Allison Haynes v. Perry County, Tennessee

Syllabus

A gunshot victim filed a tort action against a county, alleging misconduct on the part of a sheriff's deputy. The plaintiff asserted that the county was liable under both the Governmental Tort Liability Act and Tennessee Code Annotated § 8-8-302. The county moved to dismiss the complaint. The county argued that it was immune from liability under either the discretionary function exception or the public duty doctrine. The trial court dismissed the complaint. We conclude that, because the deputy sheriff's actions as alleged in the complaint were operational in nature, the county is not immune from liability under the Governmental Tort Liability Act. The complaint also contains sufficient factual allegations of reckless misconduct such that the special duty exception to the public duty doctrine could apply. So we vacate the dismissal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assault victim’s statements to police made while she was still “shaken, ... very upset, ... crying, teary eyed, red eyed” were nevertheless testimonial
  • assault victim’s statements to police made while she was still “shaken, . . . very upset, . . . crying, teary eyed, red eyed” were nevertheless testimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge W. Neal McBrayer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.