Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Lewelling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a written statement with a signature but without notarization is still not enough to make a statement substantively admissible
• holding that a written statement with a signature but without notarization is still not enough to make a statement substantively admissible
• reasoning, after it determined that a reckless misconduct standard did not apply under the facts of that case, that an ordinary negligence standard applied
• “[A]n affidavit lacking notarization is invalid[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).