Alling v. Beamis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “any dispute” and “any remaining claim or dispute” is “classically broad language
• “Before enforcing an arbitration agreement, a court must decide whether the agreement is valid under state contract law.” (citing Meyer v. Uber Techs., Inc., 868 F.3d 66, 73–74 (2d Cir. 2017)
• arbitration agreement providing for arbitration of “any dispute” was “classically broad”
• “[I]f the party seeking arbitration has substantiated the entitlement by a showing of evidentiary facts, the party opposing may not rest on a denial but must submit evidentiary facts showing that there is a dispute of fact to be tried”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).