Skip to main content
· 1/12/2001

Alliedsignal, Inc. v. Amcast International Corp.

Citations

  • 177 F. Supp. 2d 713
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5469
  • 2001 WL 456419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that prejudgment interest must be awarded to a party seeking contribution under § 113(f) in the same manner that it would be awarded to a party bringing a cost recovery action under § 107(a), because an action under § 113(f
  • “[A]n entity substantially complies with the NCP, when its actions meet the purposes of that regulation!.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.