Allied Pacific Food (Dalian) Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that 19 C.F.R. § 351.408(c)(3) is contrary to 19 U.S.C. § 1677b(c) and therefore invalid.”
• holding Commerce’s “surrogate labor rates in [NME] investigations and reviews . . . invalid”
• finding the injury to the mandatory respondent was not fairly traceable to Commerce’s failure to recalculate the separate rate as that rate did not affect the assessment of the mandatory respondent’s duties
• “The regulation requires a single calculated wage rate to be determined annually .... [and therefore] [t]he regulation does not permit a surrogate labor rate to be determined for an individual proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).