· 10/18/1983
Allied Mills, Inc. v. P.I.G., Inc.
Citations
- 454 N.E.2d 1240
- 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 3479
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s argument that plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint should not have been permitted because it was filed after the statute of limitations had expired and concluding the plaintiff’s amendment related back to the original pleading
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoffman, Staton, Neal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.