Allied Gas & Chemical Co. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “prejudice where a party is suddenly required to prove matters otherwise admitted”
• noting an admission may relate “to an ultimate fact or to an issue that is dispositive of a case”
• finding no distinction between motions to file an untimely response and motions to withdraw an admission
• stating there is no need to distinguish between a motion to file an untimely response and a motion to withdraw admission
• affirming refusal to permit late response while recognizing “the untimely response was due to inadvertence” and noting “that other courts have refused leave . . . based on inadvert[e]nce or excusable neglect on the part of counsel”
• “Other courts have found prejudice where a party is suddenly required to prove matters otherwise admitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).