Skip to main content
· 6/23/1999

Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Department of the Interior

Citations

  • 53 F. Supp. 2d 32
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9810
  • 1999 WL 437297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Exemption 6 did not justify withholding the names of individuals who commented on proposed rules because the “public has much to learn about defendants’ rulemaking process,” such as whose comments “defendants give greater weight to”
  • holding names and addresses of individuals’ who submitted written comments on proposed rulemaking regarding the reintroduction of the grizzly bear into the Bitterroot ecosystem could not be withheld pursuant to Exemption 6 because of public interest in disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sporkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.