Alliance for Global Justice v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the District could not be compelled under Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) to produce a deponent to provide the Council’s views on its own statutes
• ruling that the District could not be compelled under FED. R. CIV. P. 30 (b)(6) to produce a deponent to provide the Council‟s views on its own statutes
• “case law interpreting the Speech [or] Debate Clause is pertinent to construing the District’s analogous statute”
• “case law interpreting the Speech [or] Debate Clause is pertinent to construing the District’s analogous statute”
• “By its very nature, a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice requires the responding party to prepare a designated representative so that he or she can testify on matters not only within his or her personal knowledge, but also on matters reasonably known by the responding entity.”
• ABy its very nature, a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice requires the responding party to prepare a designated representative so that he or she can testify on matters not only within his or her personal knowledge, but also on matters reasonably known by the responding entity.@

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).