Skip to main content
· 4/21/1884

Alley v. Nott

Citations

  • 111 U.S. 472
  • 4 S. Ct. 495
  • 28 L. Ed. 491
  • 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1803

Syllabus

<p>Jurisdiction — Pleading—Removal of Causes — Statutes.</p> <p>It is within the discretion of the court, after overruling a general demurrer to a declaration or complaint as not stating facts which constitute a cause of action, to enter final judgment on the demurrer ; and such judgment if entered may be pleaded in bar to any other suit for the same cause of action. As a demurrer to a complaint because it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action raises an issue which involves the merits, a trial of the issue raised by it is a trial of the action within the meaning of § 3 of the act of March 3d, 1875, 18 Stat. 471, relating to the time within which causes may he removed from State courts. Vannevar v. Bryant, 21 Wall. 41; Isurance Company v. Dunn, 19 Wall. 214 ; King v. Worthington, 104 U. S. 44; Hewitt v. Phelps, 105 U. S. 393, distinguished from this case. Miller v. Tobin, 18 Fed. Rep. 609, overruled.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after argument on demurrer on the ground that no cause of action has been stated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waite

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.