Alley v. Angelone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prisoner did not have a protected interest in continued prison employment
• holding that a prisoner did not have a protected interest in continued prison employment
• explaining that prisoner plaintiffs “were not entitled to due process prior to the imposition of an institutional lockdown’’
• holding inmate has no liberty interest in earning good-conduct allowance
• holding prisoner did not have a protected interest in continued employment
• relying on Sandin to conclude that the prisoner plaintiffs “were not entitled to due process prior to the imposition of an institutional lockdown.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).