Skip to main content
· 12/1/1982

Allett v. Hill

Citations

  • 422 So. 2d 1047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that parole evidence is admissible to determine the intent of the parties where a latent ambiguity exists
  • finding that trial court erred in permitting plaintiffs in slip-and-fall negligence case to amend their complaint on the eve of trial to assert a breach-of-contract theory
  • finding error in “the admission of parol evidence to add a term to [a] written lease which, whether part of the preliminary negotiations or a separate subsequent condition, plainly violates ... the doctrine of merger and the parol evidence rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hersey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.