Nevada Supreme Court· 7/5/1929
Allenbach v. Ridenour
Citations
- 279 P. 32
- 51 Nev. 437
- 1929 Nev. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The law does not require idle acts\ not necessary to do justice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman, Ducker, Sanders
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tarrant v. MonsonNevada Supreme Court· 1980-12-03· cited 14×
- Watts v. ChoateMontana Supreme Court· 1945-06-14· cited 10×
- Home Savers, Inc. v. United Security Co.Nevada Supreme Court· 1987-08-27· cited 9×
- Walsh v. KennedyMontana Supreme Court· 1944-03-25· cited 7×
- Heward v. SuttonNevada Supreme Court· 1959-11-04· cited 4×
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsNew Jersey Circuit Court· 1937-12-21· cited 4×
- In Re Commercial Money Center, Equip. Lease Litig.N.D. Ohio· 2009-04-02· cited 3×
- BANK OF NEVADA VS. PETERSENNevada Supreme Court· 2016-08-12
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-06-05· cited 109×
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals· 1891-10-06· cited 82×
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-04-05· cited 56×
- Robertson v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-12-23· cited 42×
- In re Estate of SkerrettCalifornia Supreme Court· 1885-10-09· cited 36×
- Thackrah v. HaasSupreme Court· 1886-12-20· cited 33×
- Collier v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia· 1912-02-27· cited 33×
- Hill v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Ninth Circuit· 1902-03-17· cited 28×
- Noble v. TiptonIllinois Supreme Court· 1905-12-20· cited 26×
- Richards v. FraserCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-11-28· cited 23×
- Lucich v. MedinNevada Supreme Court· 1867-07-01· cited 23×
- Zimmerman v. HaferCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1895-06-18· cited 23×
- Kirby v. HuletteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1917-02-23· cited 22×
- Vandervelden v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.N.D. Iowa· 1894-04-09· cited 22×
- Conklin v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court· 1870-09-15· cited 19×
- Winter ex rel. Smith v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1901-02-12· cited 19×
- In re Estate of ShillaberCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-11-12· cited 18×
- Wiggins v. LuskIllinois Supreme Court· 1850-12-15· cited 17×
- Canton v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1887-11-18· cited 13×
- Knight v. KnightMississippi Supreme Court· 1923-09-24· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.