Allen-West Commission Co. v. Grumbles
Citations
- 129 F. 287
- 63 C.C.A. 401
- 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4043
Syllabus
<p>1. Gift — Intention of Donor — Renunciation of Dominion — Delivery.</p> <p>A fixed intention by the donor to irrevocably divest himself of title, dominion, and control of the subject of the gift at the very time he attempts to make it, the actual accomplishment of that purpose, and the delivery of the subject of the gift, are indispensable conditions of a valid donation.</p> <p>2. Same — Corporate Stock — Delivery of Certificates.</p> <p>The delivery of the subject of the gift must be made in the most effectual mode to command dominion over it.</p> <p>The delivery of certificates of shares of stock, when they are present and their delivery is practicable, is indispensable to a valid gift of stock in a corporation, because the possession of the certificates commands the dominion of the stock in the most effectual way.</p> <p>3. Same — Delivery of Written Assignment — Effect.</p> <p>The delivery of a written assignment of stock in a corporation is ineffectual to make a valid gift, while the donor retains the certificates.</p> <p>4. Same — Evidence—Conclusions.</p> <p>G., the owner of 110 shares of stock in a corporation, delivered a written assignment of his interest in its business to his wife in May, 1899, when he was free from debt. He retained the certificates of the shares, voted them, and received dividends upon them, in money and in stock, until February, 1903, when he had become heavily involved in debt. He then transferred the stock to his wife by an indorsement and surrender of the certificates to the corporation.</p> <p>Held, G. had no intention in May, 1899, to then divest himself of the dominion and control of the stock, a delivery of the certificates of the stock was indispensable to accomplish such a purpose, and the delivery of the written assignment, while the donor retained and used the certificates to control the stock, was insufficient to complete a valid gift.</p> <p>If 2. See Gifts, vol. 24, Cent. Dig. § 50.</p> <p>5. Garnishment — Order on Ga
Judges: Sanborn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weil v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFifth Circuit· 1936-03-13· cited 71×
- Tower v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1944-03-03· cited 48×
- Coffey v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1943-02-12· cited 38×
- Coffey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFifth Circuit· 1944-03-07· cited 32×
- Nipp v. BroumleyTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-04-01· cited 23×
- Tracy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSixth Circuit· 1934-04-11· cited 22×
- Rosenwald v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSeventh Circuit· 1929-06-07· cited 19×
- Waddle v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1915-04-21· cited 18×
- Stifft v. W. B. Worthen Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1928-03-05· cited 14×
- Lee v. LeeD.C. Circuit· 1925-05-04· cited 13×
- Adams v. HagerottEighth Circuit· 1929-09-18· cited 12×
- Lannan v. KelmEighth Circuit· 1955-04-26· cited 12×
- Weil v. CommissionerBoard of Tax Appeals· 1934-12-18· cited 9×
- Colston v. BurnetDistrict of Columbia· 1932-05-31· cited 9×
- Baldwin v. FleckCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1943-01-28· cited 8×
- Bingham v. WhiteD. Massachusetts· 1929-03-22· cited 7×
- Garrett v. KeisterDistrict of Columbia· 1932-01-18· cited 7×
- Conlon v. TurleyD.C. Circuit· 1926-01-04· cited 6×
- Ratterman v. LodgeEighth Circuit· 1926-05-18· cited 6×
- Chaffee v. Locomotive Engineers' Mut. Life & Acc. Ins.Tenth Circuit· 1933-10-02· cited 6×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Basket v. HassellSupreme Court· 1883-03-26· cited 177×
- Love v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court· 1886-10-14· cited 49×
- Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-08-23· cited 46×
- Holmes v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court· 1899-03-23· cited 37×
- Reed v. CopelandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1883-01-15· cited 34×
- Newman v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1898-04-19· cited 33×
- Baltimore Retort & Fire Brick Co. v. MaliCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1886-03-10· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. CromptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1890-10-13· cited 29×
- Bond v. BuntingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1875-05-10· cited 25×
- Cook v. LumSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1893-06-15· cited 25×
- Yancey v. FieldSupreme Court of Virginia· 1889-02-14· cited 24×
- Liebe v. BattmannOregon Supreme Court· 1898-08-13· cited 22×
- Snyder v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court· 1902-12-02· cited 22×
- Williams v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 20×
- Matson v. AbbeyNew York Supreme Court· 1893-07-08· cited 19×
- Jones v. FallsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1903-03-31· cited 15×
- Tarbox v. GrantNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1898-01-18· cited 13×
- Lehr v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1902-06-15· cited 12×
- Walsh v. SextonNew York Supreme Court· 1869-11-01· cited 11×
- Snook v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1900-07-01· cited 9×
Other cases named Allen-West Commission Co. v. Grumbles
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.