Skip to main content
· 3/3/2005

Allen v. Yates

Citations

  • 870 A.2d 39
  • 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 44
  • 2005 WL 612869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “because the parties did not provide for compound interest, interest ... should be calculated on the principal- balance alone”
  • “Where the parties have entered into a contract, being made whole means realizing the benefit of the bargain that they struck.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwelb, Ruiz, Glickman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.