Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 10/7/2004

Allen v. Thomas

Citations

  • 388 F.3d 147
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20953
  • 2004 WL 2251812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conduct is not random and unauthorized for purposes of Parratt/Hud-son doctrine when defendants acted under power delegated by state
  • Confiscation of items under the authority of a prison administrative directive is not a random, unauthorized act by a state employee.
  • “Because the undisputed facts reveal that [the inmate’s] word processor and radio were confiscated under the authority of a prison administrative directive, the confiscation was not a random, unauthorized act by a state employee.”
  • “Because the undisputed facts reveal that [the inmate’s] word processor and radio were confiscated under the authority of a prison administrative directive, the confiscation was not a random, unauthorized act by a state employee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benavides, Dennis, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Allen v. Thomas

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.