Skip to main content

Allen v. State

Citations

  • 971 S.W.2d 715
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 3693
  • 1998 WL 322687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rational jury could determine appellant \knew of the `apparent' injury to a cyclist\ based on testimony that appellant and others heard the collision and cyclist was visibly injured thereafter
  • finding a jury may choose to believe some testimony and disbelieve other testimony in its determination of guilt and innocence
  • finding a rational jury could determine appellant “knew of the ‘apparent’ injury to the cyclist” based on testimony that appellant and others heard the collision and that the cyclist was visibly injured after the collision
  • admitting offense includes admitting culpable mental state the crime requires

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fowler, Edelman, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.