Allen v. National RR Passenger Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no “definite and firm conviction” that the trial court had committed clear error when it weighed each Pierce factor, and the record did not contain evidence of a clear error
• finding that “failure to preserve . . . [due-process-rights violation] for appeal purposes renders th[e] issue procedurally barred.”
• affirming dismissal because “[t]he trial court certainly weighed the relevant factors in reaching its conclusion and no evidence exists in the record to support a finding of a clear error of judgment or abuse of by the trial court”
• affirming dismissal because “[t]he trial court certainly weighed the relevant factors in reaching its conclusion and no evidence exists in the record to support a finding of a clear error of judgment or abuse of by the trial court”
• “substantial prejudice is not necessary under this test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).