Allen v. Mutual Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In mitigation, the panel considered .... that relevant records had been destroyed when [respondent’s] office water pipes burst, and [respondent] apologized that she could not defend herself for this reason.”
• “In mitigation, the panel considered... that relevant records had been destroyed when [respondent’s] office water pipes burst, and [respondent] apologized that she could not defend herself for this reason.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).