Allen v. Minnesota Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a recovering, substance-addicted anesthesiologist's risk of relapse does not render him unable to return to his profession
• granting summary judgment for insurance company because treating physician’s opinion about plaintiff-anesthesiologist’s inability to return to work grounded in “future potentialities rather than any present impediment” could not possibly satisfy the Plan’s definition of disability
• reaching the same conclusion under de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).