Skip to main content
· 4/18/2012

Allen v. Mill-Tel, Inc.

Citations

  • 283 F.R.D. 631
  • 2012 WL 1344991
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he court should consider an [IFP movant’s] earning capacity and ability, even though at the moment [movant] may not be employed and thus may have no current earnings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sebelius

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.