Allen v. Merchants' Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that retaining a case “with only minimal contacts to New York” would “not serve the interest of justice”
• weighing this factor less heavily where “the locus of operative facts is split amongst several forums”
• “The convenience of non-party witnesses is accorded more weight than that of party witnesses”
• “Whether or not there are multiple loci of operative facts is irrelevant, because it does not appear that New York bears any more than a tangential relation to the facts of this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).