Allen v. Ingram
Citations
- 39 Fla. 239
Syllabus
<p>Under the statute (section 3, page 860 McClellan’s Digest) a defendant in execution or attachment, when entitled to the possession, had the right to recover, in replevin, personal property exempt by law from-such process when seized by virtue of such process, and this remedy was not taken away by the act of 1881, Chapter 3246, enlarging the equity powers of the Circuit Courts to the extent of giving them equity jurisdiction to enjoin the sale of property exempt by law and to decree the setting aside, or to restrain the setting aside, of exempt property from forced sale.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mere intoxication, absent evidence of “mania” is not enough to render a statement unintelligent and involuntary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mabry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.