Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/20/1987
Allen v. Girard
Citations
- 745 P.2d 192
- 155 Ariz. 134
- 1987 Ariz. App. LEXIS 565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute is constitutional when the challenged provision directly or indirectly relates to the subject of the title and has a natural connection therewith
- statute making it “unlawful . . . for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this state” applied when driving vehicle in a private subdivision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fernandez, Livermore, Roll
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1971-01-15· cited 184×
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-18· cited 79×
- State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court· 1954-09-27· cited 73×
- State v. ZavalaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-07· cited 41×
- State v. HaroldArizona Supreme Court· 1952-07-16· cited 41×
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-11-20· cited 37×
- In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court· 1950-06-29· cited 30×
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. HighfieldSupreme Court of Delaware· 1931-02-06· cited 22×
- White v. Kaibab Road Improvement DistrictArizona Supreme Court· 1976-05-26· cited 17×
- State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court· 1979-09-27· cited 16×
- In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court· 1950-01-16· cited 14×
- State v. SUPER. CT., GREENLEE COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-03-17· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.