Allen v. Continental Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that on-call security guard was covered under insurance policy requiring him to be “on the business of the [employer],” where, among other factors, the employer benefitted from the arrangement by reducing the number of guards who had actually to be on duty
• “[I]n the event of an ambiguity in the terms of an insurance policy any reasonable doubt will be resolved against the insurance company and in favor of extending coverage to the insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).