Allen v. American Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s reliance on § 91.13(a) was sufficient to show that “an applicable, non-specific federal standard pertains generally to his claim,” and “[t]herefore, Plaintiff has distinguished the instance case from such precedent as Margolies Mezvinsky . . . .”
• “Any action for loss of consortium is derivative, however, and the viability of such a claim depends upon the substantive merit of the injured party's claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).