Allen v. Allen
Citations
- 48 S.C. 566
- 26 S.E. 786
- 1897 S.C. LEXIS 117
Syllabus
<p>1. J urisdiction — Irregularity—Amendment—Guardian ad Litem — Minor.—Mere irregularities in the service of notice of motion for appointment of guardian ad litem on minors, and in the. appointment of and answer by the guardian, within the power of the Court to correct by amendment are not fatal to the jurisdiction of the Court over the persons of the minors.</p> <p>2. Limitation oe Actions — Setting Aside Judgment. — There is no statute in this State limiting the time within which a motion to vacate or set aside a judgment must be made, except in those cases provided in sec. 197 of Code. Following Ex parte Carroll, 17 S. C., 449.</p>
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Center v. CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-09-13· cited 14×
- Winslow v. StaabSecond Circuit· 1917-04-10· cited 6×
- Hagy v. PruittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-05-04· cited 4×
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Marlboro Cotton MillsE.D. South Carolina· 1922-01-12· cited 3×
- Mincey v. CelebrezzeW.D. South Carolina· 1965-10-14· cited 2×
- Cain v. GardnerD. South Carolina· 1966-07-08· cited 1×
- Fleming v. ChappellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1921-12-20
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.