Allen v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “some of the[family court’s] findings and conclusions were probably unfounded because no evidentiary hearing was conducted”
• stating that \some of the[family court's] findings and conclusions were probably unfounded because no evidentiary hearing was conducted\
• “Physical presence of the child and one of the contestants is not alone sufficient to confer jurisdiction on a court of this state to make a child custody determination^]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dow Chemical Co. v. Castro Alfaro
  Texas Supreme Court· 1990-05-02· cited 87×
• Yurgel v. Yurgel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-01· cited 65×
• Plas v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-05-16· cited 46×
• Cvitanovich-Dubie v. Dubie
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-06-22· cited 32×
• State Ex Rel. Laws v. Higgins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-07-28· cited 31×
• In the Interest of Doe
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 25×
• Davis v. Davis
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-11-10· cited 19×
• Schoeberlein v. Rohlfing
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-03-11· cited 10×
• Puckett v. Puckett
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2000-11-30· cited 9×
• Bullard v. Bullard
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-06-22· cited 7×
• Grayson v. Grayson
  Delaware Family Court· 1982-09-24· cited 4×
• Beals v. Kiewit Pacific Co., Inc.
  D. Hawaii· 1993-06-28· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Marriage of Ben-Yehoshua
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-03-29· cited 47×
• McCormack v. Lemond
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-10-30· cited 20×
• Both v. SUPERIOR CT., IN & FOR CTY. OF MOHAVE
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-02-01· cited 11×
• Griffith Ex Rel. Griffith v. Griffith
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-04-02· cited 5×