Allen v. Accredited Home Lenders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding service to email addresses found on defendants’ websites are “reasonably calculated” to reach defendants.
• allowing service by email to defendants in China and Poland, both of which object to Article 10
• permitting email service where “communication has occurred with a representative of the respective Defendant at those email addresses”
• Plaintiff presented the Court with verified email addresses at which it sought to serve Defendants
• “Email service has been approved even where, as here, the country objects to Article 10 of the Hague Convention.”
• “[A] plaintiff is not required to first exhaust the methods contemplated by Rule 4(f)(1) and (2) before petitioning the Court for permission to use alternative means under Rule 4(f)(3).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).