· 12/7/2004
Allen Tegtmeier v. Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund
Citations
- 390 F.3d 1040
- 34 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1012
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25069
- 2004 WL 2795114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “Social Security decisions, if available, are instructive, [but] these determinations are not dispositive”
- noting that Social Security decisions “are instructive” but not “dispositive” and that a plan’s decision “not to reopen the claims process is completely proper, given [the plan’s] concern for finality of decisions”
- noting that Social Security decisions “are instructive” but not “dispositive” and that a plan’s deci- sion “not to reopen the claims process is completely proper, given [the plan’s] concern for finality of deci- sions”
- “Larding the summary with minutiae would defeat that document’s function: to provide a capsule guide in simple language for employees.”
- applying deadlines is proper given the plan’s need “for finality of decisions”
- “While Social Security decisions, if available, are instructive, these determinations are not dis-positive .... ” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Easterbrook, Manion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.