Skip to main content
· 12/7/2004

Allen Tegtmeier v. Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund

Citations

  • 390 F.3d 1040
  • 34 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1012
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25069
  • 2004 WL 2795114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “Social Security decisions, if available, are instructive, [but] these determinations are not dispositive”
  • noting that Social Security decisions “are instructive” but not “dispositive” and that a plan’s decision “not to reopen the claims process is completely proper, given [the plan’s] concern for finality of decisions”
  • noting that Social Security decisions “are instructive” but not “dispositive” and that a plan’s deci- sion “not to reopen the claims process is completely proper, given [the plan’s] concern for finality of deci- sions”
  • “Larding the summary with minutiae would defeat that document’s function: to provide a capsule guide in simple language for employees.”
  • applying deadlines is proper given the plan’s need “for finality of decisions”
  • “While Social Security decisions, if available, are instructive, these determinations are not dis-positive .... ” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Easterbrook, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.