Skip to main content
· 1/28/1987

Allen P. DEA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Christopher S. LOOK, Jr., Et Al., Defendants, Appellees

Citations

  • 810 F.2d 12
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1391
  • 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,838
  • 42 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that to show such property interest, “an individual must establish that his expectation of continued employment is supported by a state law or regulation, or is based upon a mutually explicit understanding with the employer”
  • guoting White v. Vathally, 732 F.2d 1037, 1043 (1st. Cir.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 933 (1984) (guoting Burdine, supra, 450 U.S. at 253-54)
  • merely making out a prima facie case does not automatically save [plaintiff] from a summary, judgment motion
  • merely making out a prima facie case does not automatically save [plaintiff] from a summary judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Coffin, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.